Consent in Shibari: the conversation before the rope

By Molly Maria
Consent in Shibari means agreeing to the particular experience being proposed, with room to change your mind. Interest in rope is not agreement to every tie. A relationship is not standing permission. Neither expertise nor confidence gives one person the right to decide for the other.
I find it helpful to make the conversation concrete. ‘I trust you’ may be heartfelt, but it does not tell your partner where you want to be touched or what should happen if you need to stop.

Begin with what each of you wants

Try a question that leaves room for different answers: ‘What interests you about this?’ One person may be curious about learning a craft. The other may want closeness, playfulness or the experience of receiving attention. Knowing that difference gives you something useful to discuss.
An agreement should not be the answer one person produces to avoid disappointing the other. If one of you is uncertain, you can keep talking without turning the conversation into a session.

Put the edges into words

You might say: ‘I would like to try receiving rope, but I do not want to be photographed.’ Or: ‘I am interested in the technique, and I want to keep this fully clothed.’ Another useful sentence is: ‘I know I agreed to that before. I do not want it today.’
These are examples, not a script you must follow. The point is to make permission specific enough that the other person does not have to guess. Discuss touch, roles, intensity, privacy and who will be present as separate questions.

Agree how stopping will work

Choose clear words and, where relevant, a non-verbal signal. Make sure both people understand what each signal means and can use it in the planned activity. A signal is only useful when the other person responds to it.
I do not treat the absence of a stop signal as proof that everything is welcome. If someone becomes unresponsive, confused or unable to communicate, the priority is to stop the activity and attend to their safety. Silence is not an invitation to continue.

A useful outside resource

The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom’s Negotiation Guide prompts everyone involved to discuss intentions, experience, stop signals, privacy and care plans. I value its insistence that everyone answers, rather than one person interviewing the other. It is a conversation resource, not a guarantee against harm or a substitute for appropriate instruction.

Leave room for an ordinary ending

You can finish because you have had enough, because something no longer feels right, or because you would rather have tea and talk. The time spent preparing does not create a debt to continue.
Afterwards, a useful question is: ‘Was there anything you wanted to say and found difficult to say?’ Listen without arguing the person out of their answer. If a boundary was crossed, comfort afterwards does not erase it. Take the concern seriously and seek appropriate support.

Continue reading